![Photogrtapher unidentified. [Occupational portrait of a woman working at a sewing machine.] Sixth Plate daguerreotype, c. 1853. Library of Congress, Washington, DC.](https://i0.wp.com/genealogyalacarte.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Daguerreotype_Library-of-Congress.jpg?resize=300%2C355)
Photogrtapher unidentified. [Occupational portrait of a woman working at a sewing machine.] Sixth Plate daguerreotype, c. 1853. Library of Congress, Washington, DC.
As Brown University celebrates its 250th anniversary, Digital Production Services at the University Library has been asked to digitize many historical university materials. Some of the earliest photographs in the university’s extensive collection are daguerreotypes made of graduating classes, and Ms. Elgin was asked to digitize images of the classes of 1847 and 1852.
In an online article, Digitizing the “Mirror With a Memory,” Ms. Elgin writes: “Because lighter objects are always more visible in this type of reflective image, photographing a daguerreotype of any size requires surrounding the object with black foam, paper, or cloth that will help offset its reflective properties.”
To avoid seeing the camera’s reflection in the lens, Ms. Elgin suggests we “take a large sheet of black foam core, cut a small hole just for the lens of the camera, and cover the entire camera rig with the foam core.”
To read more about the steps required to digitize a daguerreotype, read Digitizing the “Mirror With a Memory:” How to deal with a daguerreotype’s reflective surface to make a digital archive of record.
Thanks for this timely article Gail. I do a lot of photography for the Anglican Diocese of Ottawa Archives and some of that has included daguerreotypes. Currently I have a box of WW1 photographs on 4″x3″ glass plates which have very similar reflective properties so I’m going to try this technique to see if I can get a better image.